What do you think of a Chief that won't let anyone below him drive a pumper, ladder truck or rescue squad? We are talking from Assit Chief on down?
We have career personnel of consiting of career officer and three firefighters around the clock. If they take a unit on a call no one else can drive another unit unless its a ambulance or smaller unit, so a backup pumper or the other units sit.
The chief is the only volunteer that drive those units, but he is always in his chief's vehicle if a call comes in.
EXACTLY!!! good for you for pointing that out! the chief is IN CHARGE and needs to concentrate on what the hell is happening, and what WILL happen. Plain and simple.. he does NOT TRUST his members. Thats a basic fundamental requirement in the firs service.. TRUST.. If he doesn't trust his members to even drive and operate the pumper, I can't imagine him trusting anyone but himself to go inside for primary search and rescue... sounds like he is looking for the glory and bein the HERO himself. I say out with him!!!!
Very good point.. Our dept. gives new members up until their probation period to obtain their drivers license to drive the apparatus ( here it is a CLASS 4 with air brake endorsement). If the member fails to obtain the license by the time their probation is over, they don't get to drive the rigs, AND, they don't get to respond to calls.. because they are removed from dept.
There is nothing wrong with having to take training courses in driving emergency vehicles. Having proper training and the proper licence is critical. Those who take the training and are capable...qualified..to drive the apparatus should be obligated to run the rig when the rig needs to be run... not having to wait for someone who the " chief????????? " feels is more qualified to do so. CHIEF.. If you read this.. SHAME ON YOU!
smarten your (_!_) up!!!
If the apparatus does not make it to the scene, then what's the point of having it? Sounds to me like you need some new leadership. If the department is reluctant to step up to this "Chief" (and I use the term very loosely), appeal to the public! Your residents pay taxes for fire protection - they are paying your department to provide protection, and you have an obligation to do so. If that is not being done (which clearly it is not), then the public has the right to make sure it is done. Now I am not one for airing out dirty laundry for all to see, but that is a serious issue that needs to be resolved immediately. If it cannot be fixed within your department, appeal to the local government, and if you must, go to the public. You may seem like a bad guy at first, but the people you signed up to keep safe will thank you in the long run. And you will earn the respect of those around you for not being a follower, but standing up as a leader and doing what is right for the department and the community.
Makes no sense to me....you might need other equipment at the scene that is sitting in a station WASTING taxpayer money(or fire tax)..and if I were a taxpayer there-- the chief WOULD NOT HAVE THE JOB-(volunteer or not) we have driver training state certifcations (pumper and aerial) here(N.C.)-and in our dept. you must first learn how to drive the trucks-(smallest first)-then you must learn how to pump ALL the trucks,you must also take the state cert class emergency driver(EVD), after some time behind the wheel- you must get checked off by a chief officer (pumping and driving),then you need to start pursuing your state certs on driver/operator-especially the pump classes.
With that being the case it sounds like you dont need anybody else to respond to a run and the first truck out can do it alone ,and your governing body could cut the budget by getting rid of trucks thats not being used since nobody can drive them. We have a policy at our dept that if you cannt operate the equipment at the scene you dont drive it.