I've been flipping through utube videos all night, and i am amazed at how many times departments can be seen at a car fire and not using full structural ppe, to include scba. My question is are there really that many departments tha dont require this? Full ppe should be required to be worn at any car fire, do these people just want to die young? everyones thoughts
If what you see in the videos bothers you so much.....then maybe you shouldn't watch them.
As an example, if I watched a video on how to raise children.....and they showed that filling their drink cups with half vodka and half bourbon was a good way to calm then down for a good nights sleep......I would not watch the video(s) anymore.
We require full PPE for car fires. One night we were dispatched to a car fire, We responded in our tanker. The tanker does not have SCBA inside the cab, So as I was pulling my airpack out of the compartment when a retired member walked up to me and said "put the F**ing airpack down and put some water on that fire" I finished putting on my pack and then attacked the fire. While we were cleaning up before going back in service he walked over and said "you could have saved that car if you wouldnt have wasted time with that F**ing airpack" I told him " we didnt lose the car it was fully involved before we got here, but on the bright side atleast I'm not going to get lung cancer" He did'nt like my response and stormed off. He called the chief the next day but the chief told him that I did nothing wrong.
Again I'm new to my volunteer Dept, but in observation I have noticed that the only fires the BaA's were not used were grass fires. On the ship where I work for a living and am on the Fire Party, only the entry teams require BA's, search parties and boundry cooling do not.