As I referred to in my initial post about Nolanville, TX, it seems this was an understatement. A follow up story from Austin, probably had to be tamed down.
Angered residents sparked the special meeting to reinstate the department after Mayor Emma McCullough told the department that the city couldn't afford to keep them on the payroll.
"[It's] a little un-nerving, just because of the simple fact that if they don't have the gas to get to my house to put out a fire then, I'm going to be a little upset," Sims Fanning said.
"We were invited today to be a part of this community, and to take action, and give our input, but how can you decide on important things when we are left out of the realm," the former assistant city clerk, Candid Landis, said.
It seems a few months before this battle, the town of Nolanville was wishing to extend their extraterritorial boundaries. The catch is, part of the territory they want to annex, would infringe on land claimed by at least one of the towns which were the Mayor's "mutual aid" backup plan. Now that town will file suit against Nolanville.
If they (Nolanville) could not afford to keep a fire department what makes them think they could handle more jurisdiction? Most of the area in question is farm or ranch land, which is usually tax exempt, so I don't see the revenue being there to help them.
But it it might make an interesting soap opera.
http://www.news8austin.com/content/headlines/?ArID=248574&SecID=2
You need to be a member of My Firefighter Nation to add comments!
Join My Firefighter Nation