Some months ago, I blogged about the safety of the medevac industry. I wrote the blog shortly after we had a medevac helicopter go down here in Illinois, killing everyone aboard. Here is the blog: http://www.firefighternation.com/profiles/blogs/the-safety-of-air-a....
USA Today ran a story on Thursday, August 19, 2010 that we should take notice of: http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-08-19-1Amedivac19_ST_N.htm.
The headline for the article written by Alan Levin “Medevac Industry Opposing Upgrades Wanted by NTSB” is an attention grabber, because you have to wonder upon reading it, why anyone would oppose more safety in an industry that has had a recent, poor safety record.
So as not to violate copyright laws, I will encourage to use the link and read the article.
Since year 2000 to year-to-date, there have been 122 fatalities attributed to air ambulance crashes.
I understand that, in the larger scheme, the fatalities are a small percentage when compared to the thousands of flights, but when you call your service a “life flight”, the last thing you assume is that you are going to die taking one.
Why do you think that, if the air ambulance industry is resisting safety changes, what are the reasons for it?
Are too many dying in air ambulance accidents in your mind?
If you don't think so, then is it journalism sensationalism?
TCSS.
Tags:
© 2024 Created by Firefighter Nation WebChief. Powered by