i dont know

Views: 311

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

My guess would be, they would be like rural areas without fire companies.
They would be a disaster waiting to happen and they wouldn't be able to get Fire insurance.....
Well, probably peaceful. Probably small open to wildlife (the animals kind I mean) probably boring as the tumbleweeds go rolling down the street... are there streets in that rural area, or are we talking just forests, or grassy plains, or mountains? or or or or .. one thing for sure.. no blue light bearing, tire squeeling ( Tires can squeal on gravel... I saw Steve McGarrett, and Jimmy Rockford do it on tv a gazillion times) high speed pov's ripping to a fire hall to get the horses hooked up and the boiler fire started... can you be a bit more specific Nathan? Do you mean higher insurance costs.. do you mean would the fires be more destructive? what exactly do you mean not know?
They would look the same whether they had fire companies or not, the only visible differnce would be no fire stations. Fires would spread further, but every fire goes out eventually.
Uh, I'm gonna say charred ruins.
Blacker, flatter, less underbrush, more smoke.
charred rubble or soon to be charred rubble
Betcha they would be more safe.....safer.....more safer.... More conscious about safety.
Nope, ignorance (without knowledge) is bliss....
lol...you do have a point there. There would be nobody to say if someone was doing something hazardous. Maybe that's why the Darwin award came to be.
Thanks Mike, I try.......sometimes

:-)
one word ( screwed )

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Find Members Fast


Or Name, Dept, Keyword
Invite Your Friends
Not a Member? Join Now

© 2024   Created by Firefighter Nation WebChief.   Powered by

Badges  |  Contact Firefighter Nation  |  Terms of Service