Your question can't be answered with a 'yes' or 'no' really. There are many city based firefighters around the world who are close enough to wildfire risk areas that their assistance is required. There are many city based firefighters who would never see a real wildfire, the closest they get might be a small grassfire in parkland. By saying 'small grassfire' I'm not denigrating their efforts, the risk is still there. But it's a totally different thing to a major wildfire. As is fighting a fire in a single storey home vastly different to fighting one in a huge multi-storey development, the sort of thing that big city firefighters can expect at any time.
Are you talking wildland fires in the classical sense or are you talking about vegetation fires?
And why has wildland firefighting become such a hot, bad ass topic all of a sudden?
Are we running out of stuff to talk about?
I mean; does the essence of what we do come down to "smelly boots"?
Then, I for one, will be taking a break.
TCSS.
Art
Come on Art, give the kid a break. I agree that there are many threads that exist solely to gain the OP points on the board, the two you alluded to are cases in point. However young Joey hasn't even started to become a firefighter yet, he just had a question. Of course if subsequent posters take the thread to a mine-is-bigger-than-yours type of thing then that's another matter.