SAMANTHA GROSS
Associated Press Writer

NEW YORK - Talat Hamdani traveled to Mecca to pray that her missing son, an EMT, was safe in the days after 9/11. She held out hope that his Muslim background had led to his detention as a suspect, considering it better than the alternative.


In this Tuesday, Aug. 17, 2010 photo, seated next to portraits of her son Mohammad Salman Hamdani, who was 23 when he died attempting to save lives at the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001, Talat Hamdani sits during an interview in New York.
(AP Photo/Bebeto Matthews)


Related
New York City Commission Opens WTC Site for Mosque Construction


When part of his body was returned to her - his lower half shattered into 34 pieces - it was final proof he had indeed been killed when Islamic extremists brought down the World Trade Center. As Americans take sides over plans to build an Islamic cultural center and mosque blocks away, Hamdani says it feels personal.


"Why are we paying the price? Why are we being ostracized? Our loved ones died," she said at her Lake Grove, N.Y., home. "America was founded on the grounds of religious freedom," and opposition to the cultural center "is un-American. It's unethical. And it is wrong."


The thousands of relatives of the 2,976 victims have no single representative and no unified voice, even as another 9/11 anniversary approaches. The conflict is dividing a group that in many ways has never been united, with some saying the cultural center would reopen old wounds too close to hallowed ground and others say that opposing it is tantamount to bigotry.

And some, like Vandna Jain, walk a middle ground.

"It is unfair to persecute the group, however, in turn, there should be some respect for the feelings of the people that are forever attached to this site due to their losses," the New City, N.Y., resident, whose father, Yudh, died in the north tower, wrote in an e-mail. "I think people have a right to be upset about it, just as much as people have a right to build a mosque."

Jim Riches, a former New York Fire Department deputy chief whose son, Jimmy, was killed at the trade center, believes the dispute has nothing to do with religious freedom.

"We're not telling them not to practice their religion. ... It's about location, location, location," he said, asking why the mosque couldn't be built farther away from the land that he still considers a cemetery. "It's disrespectful. You wouldn't put a Japanese cultural center at Pearl Harbor."

Liza Murphy feels differently. Her brother, Charlie, died at ground zero, but she says she doesn't lay claim to the sprawling, 16-acre site.

"It's a place where a terrible tragedy took place, but I don't see what makes it sacred," said the Brooklyn resident. "Nine years later, that now belongs to the public. And my brother and his death are private and belong to me."

Murphy says she has no objection to the planned mosque and wouldn't want to judge one group of Muslims based on the actions of another.

But Peter Gadiel says he owes no apologies for singling one group out. Since his son, James, was killed at the trade center, Gadiel has argued publicly that all Muslims should share some collective guilt for what happened on 9/11.

"The fact is that Islam does not coexist well with other religions, and you can't separate that from Islam," the Kent, Conn., resident said, explaining his stand against the mosque. "If that sounds intolerant on my part, that's too bad."

The families' impassioned responses to the prospect of the mosque have influenced the public debate.

Gov. David Paterson has suggested moving the project further away from the trade center site out of respect for opponents' feelings, while Mayor Michael Bloomberg came out in support of the mosque, calling it a test of the separation of church and state.

President Barack Obama has said he believes Muslims have the right to build the Islamic center as a matter of religious freedom, though he's also said he won't take a position on whether they should actually build it.

The imam leading plans for the center on Friday called extremism a security threat in both the West and the Muslim world. Feisal Abdul Rauf made his comments to Associated Press Television News in Bahrain during a Mideast tour funded by the U.S. State Department, but he wouldn't discuss the uproar over the Islamic center.

Relatives of those slain on Sept. 11 have made their diverging voices heard on a number of issues over the years _ from whether to try the suspects in a civilian court to the location of a proposed freedom museum at ground zero that is no longer planned for the site.

Charles Wolf, who lost his wife, Katherine, at the trade center, says emotions among family members are especially raw right now.

"This is anniversary season. It's really, really hard," the Manhattanite said. "Passions are up and this is bringing up a lot of hurt in people."

He says he worries that any decision to respond to public pressure and move the mosque would be used by extremists to paint Americans as intolerant.

"The powers of evil were piloting those airplanes," he said of the Sept. 11 attackers.

Now, with the mosque dispute, "here is where we're falling into the terrorists' trap ... trying to tear each other apart. Good people fighting other good people - does that sound like evil at work?"

___

Associated Press writers David B. Caruso and Karen Matthews in New York and Martha Raffaele in Philadelphia contributed to this report.

Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Views: 704

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Can you be more specific? Do you mean the difference between islam and christianity?
You are right. My apologies. I think I was refuring of Siq (correct spelling?). I mixed the 2 up in my mind, and was thinking Muslim was Siq.
If Sikh is the religion you were thinking of then that would be incorrect as well. Sikh is an offshoot of the hindu religion and is in no way connected or related to islam nor did they have anything remotely to do with 9/11.
Fascist Islam is different from Traditional Islam. Those who follow Fascist Islam want to abolish everyone who does not follow Islam, especially those of us from the "West". They will do this by any means, and that includes violence.
Ah. I'm not sure that there is a specific category that is "Fascist Islam". Mostly they are considered to be "extremists" and/or "fundamentalists". Not unlike any other religion the radical, extremist, fundamentalists have twisted and warped the teaching of islam into something that suits their (mostly political) needs. They justify their actions based on their interpretation of the koran. Not unlike how other religions have found justification for their actions in their own source of religious writings.
I think "Shia" vs. "Sunni" is what they were looking for. These are two divergent branches of Islam. To over-simplify a bit: Iran is an Islamic state, but it's Shia Islam. Saudi Arabia is also an Islamic state, and it is Sunni Islam. Osama Bin Ladin is Saudi, and is Sunni. I'm not sure how relevant any of that is to this discussion about the location of a community center, but it's important in understand the existence of the Sunni / Shia split and it is important in global politics. For example, when Sadam Hussein ruled Iraq, the Sunni minority dominated to the disadvantage of the Shia majority. That's causing problems now.
So the question still remains, do we uphold the constitutional rites that are to be applied to all americans, or take some sort of actions to try to prevent another unprevoked attack from the "extriemest" who are apparently very good at getting lost in the crowd so to speak. Tough question to say the least.
So the question still remains, do we uphold the constitutional rites that are to be applied to all americans, or take some sort of actions to try to prevent another unprevoked attack from the "extriemest" who are apparently very good at getting lost in the crowd so to speak. Tough question to say the least

So preventing the mosque, in your opinion, is equivalent to preventing another unprovoked attack? How so?
Bottom line is you uphold the freedoms and rights constitutionally bestowed upon all Americans. At least if you were a true patriot, you would.
What action(s) would you suggest?

Either we protect all the rights of all the citizens all of the time, or it's fair game as to who is protected from what for how long. The constitution, amendments etc is not a cafeteria menu from which you pick what most suits you or the occasion. They are the bedrock this nation was built on.
I didnt say that not allowing a mosque to built was a way to prevent another attack. constitutional rites that are to be applied to all americans, thats exactly what I ment ALL AMERICANS. Not just a few hear and there.
Anyway that you look at this situation there are going to be people that are unhappy.
And as far as your comment about the constitution goes, dont patronize me. I know the beliefs and ideas this country was founded on.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Find Members Fast


Or Name, Dept, Keyword
Invite Your Friends
Not a Member? Join Now

© 2024   Created by Firefighter Nation WebChief.   Powered by

Badges  |  Contact Firefighter Nation  |  Terms of Service