A recent thread has brought out some different views on an aspect of the fireground. So I thought we could see what is done in different places, and why. What I don’t want is for this thread to degenerate into insults. We do things differently, for different reasons. I’m the curious type, I like to know things.
Civilians helping on the fireground. By civilians I mean anyone other than a recognised firefighter. Now that in itself raises a question. What is a recognised firefighter? In many places in the US it appears to be someone who has attained FF1 and FF2. Here, in my little part of the world – an Australian State about the same size as Kentucky, if that makes it easier for anyone, we do things our way. Volunteers are taken in and put through a part time recruit course which gets them to our most basic FF level – Wildfire Firefighter. All volunteers go through this training first, then more levels can be worked for depending on the fire risk profile of their individual Brigade. (I don’t particularly agree with that last sentence, but I don’t run our Fire Service) We have one Fire Service that controls most of the State – over 1200 Fire Brigades and over 50,000 volunteers. We also have several hundred career firefighters, I won’t go into their training. Any firefighter is allowed onto any fireground, but is only allowed to perform duties for which they have attained the qualification. That is how we recognise a firefighter. How do we recognise a civilian? Anyone else, basically. Juniors aren’t allowed on the fireground. We don’t have the Explorer program.
Now come the ‘what ifs’.
1. We’re short handed (who isn’t at some time?) at a structure fire. A person comes up to the IC and offers to help. Normally, they’ll be told thanks, but no thanks. Perhaps though there’s a need to drag a lot of hose to the nearest hydrant. Should the IC allow the civilian to assist? I know of it happening, but I don’t agree with it. Injuries would cause headaches.
2. There’s a huge wildfire. Should we allow untrained civilians to volunteer their services? We used to do this all the time, as recently as 1983 (a year any Australian firefighter will know about I think). We no longer allow this to happen. A farmer may very well be fighting the fire on his own or a neighbouring property, but that’s a different case. We no longer allow casual volunteers. Methods of fighting fires have changed drastically, and require people trained in those methods. Wildfires are too dangerous to mess around with.
3. There’s a bad MVA. A civilian is first on the scene and starts giving 1st Aid. Fire arrive (we’re usually there first), ambulance close behind (separate service here, but the idea carries on), then police. Should we as Fire (and only 1st Aid trained, not EMT) tell the person to move away? After all, he/she may be higher qualified than we are! Should the Paramedics tell the person to leave, should the Police? OK, chances are that person will be left assisting until the Paramedics say differently – they’re in charge of the scene if there’s no fire.
So now it’s your turn. You don’t have to stick to my cases, they may not fit your operations or experience. It’s the general idea I’m interested in. You should be able to see where I and/or my FRS sit on this sort of thing. Again, please note, no insults, no nastiness, no attacking people. If those sorts of thing happen the thread will close.