For the second year, taxpayers are screaming about the end-of-year bonuses provided to Wall Street executives.

While the pile is money is much lower, career firefighters are encountering taxpayer anger. Let's look at two issues:

TIME-TO-RETIRE

In the last half of the 20th century, some IAFF locals and state associations were successful in reducing the time required to qualify for a pension. Part of the argument was the punishing work conditions as a city firefighter in the 1940s and 1950s.

For example, if I was hired by Prince George's County in the early 1970's I could get a full pension after 20 years of service, instead of the 25 years needed to retire from Fairfax County. My ex, a civilian professional working in the fire department, always reminds me that she needs to work 32 years to get her county pension when she turns 55.

Some departments have multiple retirement plans, based on when you started work. A person hired in PG today does not have the same generous retirement program enjoyed by the firefighters hired in the 1960s.

The issue with DCFD Chief Ellerbe on leave with out pay while working as the Sarasota County fire chief is an example of the nuances. When Ellerbe started with the District of Columbia fire department he needed to complete BOTH 25 years of service AND be 50 years old to start receiving a pension. Other DCFD members just need to achieve 25 years of time-in-service. Dave Statter, STATter911, provides the details HERE.

A December 26, 2009 Wall Street Journal article looked at the impact the recession has on local government. Conor Dougherty, writing in "As Slump Hits Home, Cities Downsize Their Ambitions" makes this observation:

More likely to be union members, government workers tend to be better paid and have greater job security than many of the taxpayers who pay their salaries. Benefits are often better, too. Virtually all full-time state and local workers have access to retirement benefits; in the private sector, about 76% of full-time employees had retirement benefits. Employment in local government peaked in August 2008 and has fallen by 117,000 since then, or less than 1%, compared with a 6.3% fall in private employment from its December 2007 peak. (full article HERE)

RETIREMENT BENEFITS

On Firegeezer.com we posted an article about "Gilt-Edged Pensions" in response to an article published in the February 16, 2009 issue of Forbes magazine. Stephanie Fitch's opening paragraph was designed to get your attention:

Your 401(k) isn't doing too well, is it? But you're footing the bill for some lucky stiffs who don't have to worry about market crashes, medical costs or inflation.

The article featured police chief Glenn Goss. Goss retired as a Delray Beach police commander at 42 and took a job as the Highland Beach police chief. He gets a lifetime pension of $65,000 from Delray and, assuming he lives to the actuarial age of 78, represents a $2 million liability to Florida taxpayers. Fitch points out that there are "millions" of public safety employees with defined-benefit retirement programs.

Defined-benefit plans provide pension income to retired employees on the basis of a formula that accounts for a worker’s years of service at a firm and earnings. Distributions are typically made for the remainder of the employee’s life, making the plan similar to an annuity. Definition from Tax Policy Center of the Urban Center and Brookings Institution HERE

Forbes article HERE, Fossilmedic column HERE.

Sarasota's reporting on Chief Ellerbe points out that the combination of DCFD pension and county salary approaches $250,000 a year. There is nothing illegal or improper about this situation, but generates the same anger as the federal government payout of Wall Street bonuses.

WHEN THE MONEY RUNS OUT

Forbes, The Wall Street Journal and The Economist have a pro-business anti-labor editorial point-of-view. Even with this bias, they make a couple of points that we cannot ignore.

A December 10, 2009 article in The Economist, makes the following observation in "Welcome to The Real World":


... public-sector workers are spoiled rotten. Government employees earn 21% more than private ones and are 24% more likely to have access to health care. Only 21% of private workers enjoy a defined-benefit (DB) pension, which guarantees retirement income based on years of service and final salary. But 84% of state and local workers still receive DB plans. Article HERE

Defined benefits retirement program obligates the municipality for decades. To meet that obligation, local governments are reducing health benefits, laying off employees and reducing expenditures. It may not be enough.

The City of Vallejo filed for Chapter 9 bankruptcy on May 06, 2008 (HERE). One of the goals of filing for bankruptcy was to break existing public safety labor contracts and pension obligations.

I am sad that 50 years of efforts to improve the working conditions of career firefighters is crumbling in the face of the 2008 recession.

Even if the economy starts to grow today, we are two to three budget cycles away from significant increases in local government revenue. Some think that we will not see a rapid return to the growth and revenue during the 1990's.

The experts interviewed in The Economist article say it time for a fundamental restructuring of work conditions, pay and benefits.

What do you think?

Mike "FossilMedic" Ward

Edited version of post at Firegeezer.com: http://firegeezer.com/2009/12/31/firefighter-aig-problem/

Views: 206

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of My Firefighter Nation to add comments!

Join My Firefighter Nation

Comment by Mike Ward on January 1, 2010 at 11:35pm
FETC,

Thanks for the comments and the video link.

Retirement and worker compensation require constant vigilance and personal/organizational vigilance. It is not fun, sexy or often interesting ... until you need it.

Hope you have a great 2010, thanks for the help in 2009!

Mike
Comment by FETC on January 1, 2010 at 8:25pm
After watching that video I now have to ask all the non-paid firefighters in the FFN who have private retirement plans... that if you found out your employer decided, to balance their own business or personal budget (maybe they decided to pocket your 401 matching investment into their own annual stipend) would there be an outcry?

I don't care who you are.... when someone promises, agrees or negotiates matching funds but you were not told about the lack of matching contributions until nearly your retirement date... thats BS.
Comment by FETC on January 1, 2010 at 7:51pm
Mike,

As with some other posts like DaGonz in the other blog, many have only half the truth but capture statistics that they want to hear and sell to the public.

In the good times, many municipalities lobbied to reduce their "employer" contributions (because the bull market was great) Now I contribute nearly 10% of my paycheck every week into the firefighter retirement system, (note not many private sector 401's are banking that each week from their pay) When the times were good... lobbist won the right to pay (0) zip, nothing from the employer side contribution because of the market's #s or returns were insane, yes our firefighter contribution (money) was still invested each and every week, and for those who don't know it is invested into the stock market. When the money was rolling in, we were chump change to the municipalities. Now that the market has changed for the worse we are a huge liability to them and all the taxpayers.

Watch this video I posted about the New Jersey firefighter retirement system, and maybe you and others will see what the firefighters feel was not in their best interest... but they had no say on how the employer handled their personal committment to the employees retirement.

http://www.firefighternation.com/video/nj-retirement-the-truth

TCSS
FETC

Find Members Fast


Or Name, Dept, Keyword
Invite Your Friends
Not a Member? Join Now

© 2024   Created by Firefighter Nation WebChief.   Powered by

Badges  |  Contact Firefighter Nation  |  Terms of Service