HELLO EVERYONE,I have been having a discussion with fellow firefighters on my department about wearing reflective vests while on accident scenes, some people feel since our turn-out gear is pretty well reflective  already is there a need to where them to? any advice would be appreciated thanks.

Views: 100

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Unless your PPE meets the newest an current reflective standards for turn-out reflectivety then you are required to wear the reflective vests meeting the standard. Yup! I know it seems silly and ultamately I think its more about the industry lobying to make us all spend money and buy vests but thats the way it is. Better to be safe and meet the standards then sorry an have someone get hurt or worse.
Have you all been in a cave somewhere?

See this response by Mike Schlags (Capt. Busy) - http://www.firefighternation.com/forum/topics/889755:Topic:1162989?...

and this article - http://respondersafety.com/Articles/High_Visibility_Firefighter_Saf...

So unless your gear has way more reflexite than the norm, yes you have to wear them. Stripes on cuffs, legs, wrists, arms and torso are not considered enough. The bigger question is: Why would you NOT want to wear them? Anything to make yourself more visible can't be a bad thing.
It is a Federal Mandate as of November of 2008 that ANYONE working within 50 feet of a federally funded roadway HAS to wear an ansi class 2 or class 3 safety vest/jacket...Turn-out gear does NOT meet that standard...the only exception to the rule is that if you are in full gear manning a hoseline then you do not have to have it on....if your department chooses to ignore this and someone gets hurt....well it will be a big picnic and they are serving shit sandwiches..guess who will take the first big bite....? Your Chief....
Personaly, I wish they made a whole jumpsuit out of the stuff and added a flashing red light to velco to the top of my helmet to wear on all MVA's or any other scene where I'm near a street or highway!

Unless you WANT to bounce off of the hood of Tiffany's SUV because she was texting because "OMG!!! Bethany and Richie BROKE UP!!!!"

I saw a blurb on the news this morning that someone has come up with a device that attaches to your vehicle that jams cell phone receptoion as soon as the transmission goes it to Drive(or 1st gear, I suppose.) I would be completely behind a federal mandate that this device be MANDATORY on ALL vehicles!!!
Did I read something some time back about there having to be a warrant before a cop could go through someone's phone?
That road is a scary place when you're working on it. As mentioned before, why would anyone NOT want to wear a vest. I thought it was mandatory as well. If not, then it should be.
The more visibility the better as far as I'm concerned. You can't be watching your back and concentrating on the scene so anything that helps is truely welcome.
Derek,

Yeah it was the NYT article that I had seen. It's reassuring to know I knew what I thought I knew, ya know?

You're right, it depends on where you are when you get arrested. Your third link, the cnet one is very interesting.

I wouldn't necessarily see it as a violation of privacy for police to see if a phone call or text message was the cause of an accident. On the other hand, to whom the call or text was sent might be another matter.
Apparently some people didn't get the memo.
Re: Bethany and Richie...I suspect Snookie is involved somewhere.
Whether there is or not our Dept mandates it and for my own personal safety I will wear one unless advised to pack up due to possible fire.
If you are not fighting fire wear the vest.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Find Members Fast


Or Name, Dept, Keyword
Invite Your Friends
Not a Member? Join Now

© 2024   Created by Firefighter Nation WebChief.   Powered by

Badges  |  Contact Firefighter Nation  |  Terms of Service