Dear Chief…Should a paramedic certification be a prerequisite for promoting to company officer?
By Scott Cook
Editor’s Note: This letter isn’t directed at a specific chief; it’s written in this format to make a point.
Dear Chief,
It’s me again. It’s been sometime since we last spoke.
Here’s what I know about you. On a personal level, your troops love you. They really do. They tell me you’re a stand-up guy who has an open-door policy and abides by that policy. They feel they can come to you with any concern and you will give them a fair shake at changing your mind, and sometimes, following a debate of the issue, you do change your mind. I truly applaud you for that.
But … you recently had a promotion test. More than 60 percent of your firefighters took the test, and one guy passed. What’s more, you wouldn’t allow several of your better qualified and EXPERIENCED firefighters to test because they don’t sport a paramedic certificate. Rumor has it that at the department you came from, when you were riding backward in the engine and wearing a paramedic patch, your company officer was a lowly EMT, and for whatever reason that didn’t sit well with you.
I’m willing to bet that he was a bad company officer, and from that standpoint, I can sympathize. Now though, you’ve chosen to deplete the morale of your troops so that paramedics won’t have to be supervised by someone “beneath” them. Granted, you did promote the one guy who passed the test. He has the least experience of anyone on your department, but he’s evidently a good test-taker—the best one out of all of your paramedics (think about that for a minute).
And now, he’s your new officer because he’s the best test-taker out of all your paramedics. (Yes, I said it twice; it needs to sink in.)
He reflects you on the scene when you’re not there. He makes the life-and-death, go/no-go decisions for his company and your department—because he’s the best test-taker out of all your paramedics. Are you following me here?
After the test, you decided that you would let only the members who failed the test retake it. Then you gave the same damn test! And several of your EXPERIENCED firefighters were again not allowed to test, because they aren’t paramedics.
Following the second test, you added a weighting system that gives weight to experience and job performance in addition to test scores—which is a great concept and I applaud that as well. But again, by leaving out experienced firefighters who aren’t paramedics, you’re automatically eliminating a pool of qualified applicants.
Let me be honest here. A paramedic certification is nothing to sneeze at, but many EMTs are first-rate at their jobs, and they can make just as good company officers as paramedics. Second, you’re letting your bad experience working for an EMT officer get in the way. I appreciate where you’re coming from; we’ve all had poor company officers. But don’t take it out on the personnel you have now.
Instead of killing the morale and unity of your troops, why not write a simple SOP that says, “It shall be the policy of the department that the senior officer is in charge of the overall scene at all times. The senior paramedic is responsible for patient care.” Problem solved. You have a better chance of promoting a competent company officer, morale is improved, and all is well.
Yes, it’s just that simple. Don’t believe me? Is it any different than allowing EMTs to ride the seat when the company officer takes vacation or a sick day? The message that sends to the troops: “Hey, you’re only good enough to ride the seat when no one else is available.” I know that’s not the message you’re trying to send. But perception is reality to the perceiver.
Like I said, Chief, your troops love you on a personal level. Now it’s time to be fair to them. Don’t single out the paramedics you have for promotion just because they passed a non-fire related exam. And don’t rule out the possibility of EMTs making great company officers.
Scott Cook is the former chief of the Granbury (Texas) Volunteer Fire Department and a fire service instructor. He’s also a member of FireRescue’s editorial board.
Copyright © Elsevier Inc., a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. SUBSCRIBE to
FIRERESCUE
You need to be a member of My Firefighter Nation to add comments!
Join My Firefighter Nation