LexisNexis(R) logo

PAUL EAKINS
Press - Telegram

LONG BEACH - Eight Long Beach fire stations will be affected by "rolling brownouts" starting today.

Although none will technically be closed, one station will lose a fire engine on a rotating basis each day, fire officials said Thursday. The eight stations will each still have either an ambulance, a ladder truck or both on duty, officials said.

"We look to see if that facility has multiple units assigned to it, because we are trying to avoid making a station completely empty," Deputy Fire Chief Jeff Reeb said about how the brownout stations were determined.

However, with an engine out, neighboring fire stations will have to cover the areas that are protected by the brownout stations. Fire officials have said that the brownouts could lead to a possible increase in response times.

Other cuts - the elimination of an ambulance at Station 12 in North Long Beach, an engine at Station 1 downtown and an engine at Station 14 by Colorado Lagoon - will mean no Long Beach fire stations have more than one engine any longer, Reeb said.

He said that the Fire Department will move resources around similarly to the system it uses now during an emergency incident.

"Even during the day, the station where that unit has been browned out could be temporarily filled," Reeb said. "Think about it as chess pieces on the board that get constantly moved around to protect the city."

The first fire station that will be affected today is Station 9, located at 3917 Long Beach Blvd. just south of Virginia Country Club in Bixby Knolls.

That information was shared by Fire Chief Alan Patalano on Wednesday, but on Thursday fire officials wouldn't say which other seven of Long Beach's 24 fire stations will also face brownouts.

"I'm not going to advertise where those locations are because of Homeland Security," Reeb said.

The cuts to the Fire Department are part of citywide budget reductions that the City Council approved in September to eliminate an $18.5 million general fund deficit.

Overall, the number of firefighters on duty at any given time citywide will drop from 133 to 126 because 21 vacant fire positions are being eliminated from the budget.

The city could yet put a stop to the brownouts, but that will depend upon officials reaching a deal with the Long Beach Firefighters Association.

The Firefighters Association has agreed to a pay freeze that it says will stop both the rolling brownouts and the elimination of an ambulance, but city officials say the savings aren't enough.

Firefighters Association President Rich Brandt said Thursday that he is still corresponding with city officials about the proposal, which a slim majority of firefighters recently approved.

"I'm at a loss right now," Brandt said. "I can't change the deal that I brought to my members."

Copyright 2010 ProQuest Information and Learning
All Rights Reserved
ProQuest SuperText
Copyright 2010 Los Angeles Newspaper Group
September 30, 2010

Views: 185

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I just saw this news feed this week on the local LA news broadcast while visiting.  I have to say, I have a real problem on a few points of this "brownout" process.  I realize that seconds in a burning structure are important but not crucial as are minutes.  having these brownouts will add at least 1-4 minutes to any given response time to the areas affected by the brownouts.  However, each station that experiences the brownout will still have the Rescue squad fully staffed during that brownout.  So my main problem lies here....mr. and mrs. john smith have lived in their home in Long Beach, CA for 5 years, never missing a tax payment and shopping in town to keep money in the community.  The city council decides where that money should best be spent, which is what we all expect.  However, in most municipalities, a set percentage of each tax dollar is allocated to fire and police departments.  The problem lies in that once that money is allocated, it no longer is in the hands of the city council but of the respective departments.  If I was Mr. and Mrs. Smith, I'd be beating down city halls doors and telling them to keep their hands out of my protection money.  I realize that costs increase over the year and replacement of apparatus and such is necessary.  However, when we start to risk the cost of a human life or multiple lives, where does the bottom line equal out?  This is a tender issue and I realize I'm boiling it down to a simplistic view but....I don't go to Wal Mart and pay for a shirt but let Wal Mart tell me what days I can wear it do I?  The town should not be allowed to dictate what day to put it's citizens at greater risk of life safety.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Find Members Fast


Or Name, Dept, Keyword
Invite Your Friends
Not a Member? Join Now

© 2025   Created by Firefighter Nation WebChief.   Powered by

Badges  |  Contact Firefighter Nation  |  Terms of Service